Articles de journaux |
Shawn Pope; Alwyn Lim The Governance Divide in Global Corporate Responsibility: Structuration and Regime Complexity in Reporting and Certification Frameworks, 1998-2017 Article de journal Organization Studies, 2019. Résumé | Liens | BibTeX @article{Alwyn2019,
title = {The Governance Divide in Global Corporate Responsibility: Structuration and Regime Complexity in Reporting and Certification Frameworks, 1998-2017},
author = {Shawn Pope and Alwyn Lim},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619830131},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-03-14},
journal = {Organization Studies},
abstract = {In recent decades, as worldwide attention to corporate responsibility increased, the global corporate responsibility (GCR) movement did not converge on a singular governance model nor hybridize into myriad country-specific models. The movement, rather, bifurcated into onerous certification frameworks and more lax reporting frameworks. We examine this ‘governance divide’ in the GCR movement by investigating the cross-national diffusion of seven core GCR frameworks. We adopt a glocalization perspective that conceptualizes a vertical nesting of local and global contexts. Our cross-national quantitative analyses suggest that, while linkages to global culture have encouraged business participation in all GCR frameworks, power dependencies related to international trade and domestic factors related to effectiveness of local governance institutions have contributed to divergent diffusion patterns across reporting and certification frameworks. We discuss these findings in relation to several organizational perspectives and note their implications for further research on corporate responsibility.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
In recent decades, as worldwide attention to corporate responsibility increased, the global corporate responsibility (GCR) movement did not converge on a singular governance model nor hybridize into myriad country-specific models. The movement, rather, bifurcated into onerous certification frameworks and more lax reporting frameworks. We examine this ‘governance divide’ in the GCR movement by investigating the cross-national diffusion of seven core GCR frameworks. We adopt a glocalization perspective that conceptualizes a vertical nesting of local and global contexts. Our cross-national quantitative analyses suggest that, while linkages to global culture have encouraged business participation in all GCR frameworks, power dependencies related to international trade and domestic factors related to effectiveness of local governance institutions have contributed to divergent diffusion patterns across reporting and certification frameworks. We discuss these findings in relation to several organizational perspectives and note their implications for further research on corporate responsibility. |
Pope Shawn; Patricia Bromley; Alwyn Lim; John W. Meyer The Pyramid of Nonprofit Responsibility: The Institutionalization of Organizational Responsibility Across Sectors Article de journal VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Non-profit Organizations, 29 (6), p. 1300-1314, 2018. Résumé | Liens | BibTeX @article{W2018,
title = {The Pyramid of Nonprofit Responsibility: The Institutionalization of Organizational Responsibility Across Sectors},
author = {Pope Shawn; Patricia Bromley; Alwyn Lim; John W. Meyer },
doi = {10.1007/s11266-018-0038-3 },
year = {2018},
date = {2018-01-01},
journal = {VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Non-profit Organizations},
volume = {29},
number = {6},
pages = {1300-1314},
abstract = {Observers have noted that organizations in all sectors, whether business, nonprofit, or government, have been moving toward rationalized structures that presuppose and express empowered organizational actorhood. We draw upon neo-institutional theory in this paper to extend the argument: The arrival of organizational actorhood has precipitated a concomitant, cross-sectoral movement toward organizational social responsibility. Whereas existing research has tended to theorize the social responsibilities of businesses, we develop a pyramid conceptual schema to array the social responsibilities of nonprofits. We then document the coevolution of organizational actorhood and responsibility across both sectors with a
metastudy of nearly 200 extant surveys. We chart the institutionalization of a slate of formal structures that
express organizational actorhood (i.e., mission statements, vision statements, and strategic plans) and that profess and define organizational social responsibilities (i.e., core values, ethics codes, and responsibility communications). We close with implications and future directions for organizational studies and research on corporate social responsibility.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Observers have noted that organizations in all sectors, whether business, nonprofit, or government, have been moving toward rationalized structures that presuppose and express empowered organizational actorhood. We draw upon neo-institutional theory in this paper to extend the argument: The arrival of organizational actorhood has precipitated a concomitant, cross-sectoral movement toward organizational social responsibility. Whereas existing research has tended to theorize the social responsibilities of businesses, we develop a pyramid conceptual schema to array the social responsibilities of nonprofits. We then document the coevolution of organizational actorhood and responsibility across both sectors with a
metastudy of nearly 200 extant surveys. We chart the institutionalization of a slate of formal structures that
express organizational actorhood (i.e., mission statements, vision statements, and strategic plans) and that profess and define organizational social responsibilities (i.e., core values, ethics codes, and responsibility communications). We close with implications and future directions for organizational studies and research on corporate social responsibility. |
Shawn Pope; Alwyn Lim International Organizations as Mobilizing Structures: World CSR Associations and their Disparate Impacts on Members’ CSR Practices Article de journal Social Forces, 95 (4), p. 1725-1756, 2017. Résumé | Liens | BibTeX @article{Lim2017,
title = {International Organizations as Mobilizing Structures: World CSR Associations and their Disparate Impacts on Members’ CSR Practices},
author = {Shawn Pope; Alwyn Lim},
doi = {doi.org/10.1093/sf/sox023},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-04-04},
journal = {Social Forces},
volume = {95},
number = {4},
pages = {1725-1756},
abstract = {International organizations are key players in globalization, but not all international organizations influence global processes in the same ways. In this paper, we argue that differences in international organizations’ mobilizing structures can shape the extent to which these organizations can positively impact the practices of their members. We present the first comparative and quantitative assessment of world corporate social responsibility (CSR) associations that comprise business participants that act collectively to address pressing social and environmental concerns. We conduct time-series panel regression analyses of a unique dataset of business participation in three core world CSR associations and test their effects on business adoption of three major CSR frameworks and business performance across six major CSR evaluation schemes. Our findings reveal that world CSR associations with participatory structures, compared to those with honorific or convocational structures, more consistently encourage member businesses to adopt CSR policies and to achieve highly evaluated CSR practices. We discuss these results in relation to sociological and world society perspectives on international organizations as well as implications for future research on global corporate responsibility.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
International organizations are key players in globalization, but not all international organizations influence global processes in the same ways. In this paper, we argue that differences in international organizations’ mobilizing structures can shape the extent to which these organizations can positively impact the practices of their members. We present the first comparative and quantitative assessment of world corporate social responsibility (CSR) associations that comprise business participants that act collectively to address pressing social and environmental concerns. We conduct time-series panel regression analyses of a unique dataset of business participation in three core world CSR associations and test their effects on business adoption of three major CSR frameworks and business performance across six major CSR evaluation schemes. Our findings reveal that world CSR associations with participatory structures, compared to those with honorific or convocational structures, more consistently encourage member businesses to adopt CSR policies and to achieve highly evaluated CSR practices. We discuss these results in relation to sociological and world society perspectives on international organizations as well as implications for future research on global corporate responsibility. |
Shawn Pope; Arild Waerass CSR-washing is Rare: A Conceptual Framework, Literature Review and Critique Article de journal Journal of Business Ethics, 137 (1), p. 137-173, 2016. Résumé | Liens | BibTeX @article{Waerass2016,
title = {CSR-washing is Rare: A Conceptual Framework, Literature Review and Critique},
author = {Shawn Pope; Arild Waerass},
doi = {doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2546-z},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Business Ethics},
volume = {137},
number = {1},
pages = {137-173},
abstract = {Growth in CSR-washing claims in recent decades has been dramatic in numerous academic and activist contexts. The discourse, however, has been fragmented, and still lacks an integrated framework of the conditions necessary for successful CSR-washing. Theorizing successful CSR-washing as the joint occurrence of five conditions, this paper undertakes a literature review of the empirical evidence for and against each condition. The literature review finds that many of the conditions are highly contingent, rendering CSR-washing as a complex and fragile outcome. This finding runs counter to the dominant perception in the general public, among activists, and among a vocal contingent of academics that successful CSR-washing is rampant.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Growth in CSR-washing claims in recent decades has been dramatic in numerous academic and activist contexts. The discourse, however, has been fragmented, and still lacks an integrated framework of the conditions necessary for successful CSR-washing. Theorizing successful CSR-washing as the joint occurrence of five conditions, this paper undertakes a literature review of the empirical evidence for and against each condition. The literature review finds that many of the conditions are highly contingent, rendering CSR-washing as a complex and fragile outcome. This finding runs counter to the dominant perception in the general public, among activists, and among a vocal contingent of academics that successful CSR-washing is rampant. |
Shawn Pope; John W. Meyer Local Variation in World Society: Six Characteristics of Global Diffusion Article de journal European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology , 3 (2-3), p. 280-305, 2016. Résumé | Liens | BibTeX @article{Meyer2016,
title = {Local Variation in World Society: Six Characteristics of Global Diffusion},
author = {Shawn Pope; John W. Meyer},
doi = {10.1080/23254823.2016.1211484},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology },
volume = {3},
number = {2-3},
pages = {280-305},
abstract = {We review world society research that theorises differences rather than similarities in diffusion into local settings. Six characteristics of global diffusion processes, most of which contribute directly to local variation, are featured: structural embeddedness, decoupling, domestication, multiple diffusion, contingent diffusion, and multi-level diffusion. We illustrate each characteristic with examples from, and applications to, the global movement for corporate social responsibility.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
We review world society research that theorises differences rather than similarities in diffusion into local settings. Six characteristics of global diffusion processes, most of which contribute directly to local variation, are featured: structural embeddedness, decoupling, domestication, multiple diffusion, contingent diffusion, and multi-level diffusion. We illustrate each characteristic with examples from, and applications to, the global movement for corporate social responsibility. |
Shawn Pope; John W. Meyer The Global Corporate Organization Article de journal Management and Organization Review, 11 (2), p. 173-179, 2015. BibTeX @article{Meyer2015,
title = {The Global Corporate Organization},
author = {Shawn Pope; John W. Meyer},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-07-14},
journal = {Management and Organization Review},
volume = {11},
number = {2},
pages = {173-179},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
|
Book Chapters |
Shawn Pope; Patricia Bromley Management Ideas and the Social Construction of Organizations Book Chapter Sturdy, Andrew; Heusinveld, Sturdy Andrew
Stefan; Reay, Heusinveld Stefan
Trish; Strang, Reay Trish
David; David, Strang (Ed.): The Oxford Handbook of Management Ideas , Chapitre 22, p. 411-426, Oxford University Press, Oxford, England United Kingdom, 2019. Résumé | BibTeX @inbook{Patricia2019,
title = {Management Ideas and the Social Construction of Organizations},
author = {Shawn Pope and Patricia Bromley },
editor = {Andrew Sturdy AND Sturdy Andrew
Stefan Heusinveld AND Heusinveld Stefan
Trish Reay AND Reay Trish
David Strang AND Strang David},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-01-01},
volume = {The Oxford Handbook of Management Ideas},
pages = {411-426},
publisher = {Oxford University Press},
address = {Oxford, England United Kingdom},
chapter = {22},
abstract = {This chapter examines cultural transformations that have contributed to the expansion of management ideas in number, domains, and across sectors. The discussion is organized around a conceptual model that depicts propositions arguing that cultural foundations underpin the expansion of management ideas and formal organization as core elements of contemporary society. These cultural foundations include scientization, individual rights & capacities, and ongoing individual education and professionalization. The processes identified are illustrated with examples of particular management ideas that have contributed to the standardization of organizations as a single, meta-form of social structure. The chapter ends by discussing research implications and future scholarly directions.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
This chapter examines cultural transformations that have contributed to the expansion of management ideas in number, domains, and across sectors. The discussion is organized around a conceptual model that depicts propositions arguing that cultural foundations underpin the expansion of management ideas and formal organization as core elements of contemporary society. These cultural foundations include scientization, individual rights & capacities, and ongoing individual education and professionalization. The processes identified are illustrated with examples of particular management ideas that have contributed to the standardization of organizations as a single, meta-form of social structure. The chapter ends by discussing research implications and future scholarly directions. |
Shawn Pope The Horn that Didn’t Toot: The Surprisingly Weak Relationship from Advertising to Corporate Social Responsibility Book Chapter Boubaker, Sabri; Cumming, Douglas; Nguyen, Duc Khuong (Ed.): Chapitre 1, p. 3-28, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, England, UK, 2018. BibTeX @inbook{Pope2018,
title = {The Horn that Didn’t Toot: The Surprisingly Weak Relationship from Advertising to Corporate Social Responsibility},
author = {Shawn Pope},
editor = {Sabri Boubaker AND Douglas Cumming AND Duc Khuong Nguyen},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-01-01},
pages = {3-28},
publisher = {Edward Elgar Publishing},
address = {Cheltenham, England, UK},
chapter = {1},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
|
John W. Meyer; Shawn Pope; Andy Isaacson. Legitimating the Transnational Corporation in a World Society Book Chapter Lim, Alwyn; Tsutsui, Kiyo (Ed.): Chapitre 2, p. 27-73, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2015. Liens | BibTeX @inbook{Isaacson.2015,
title = {Legitimating the Transnational Corporation in a World Society},
author = {John W. Meyer; Shawn Pope; Andy Isaacson. },
editor = {Alwyn Lim AND Kiyo Tsutsui},
doi = {10.1017/CBO9781316162354.002},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
pages = {27-73},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
address = {Cambridge, UK},
chapter = {2},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
|
Shawn Pope Why Firms Participate in the Global Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives, 2000-2012 Book Chapter Lim, Alwyn; Tsutsui, Kiyo (Ed.): Chapitre 8, p. 251-285, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2015. Liens | BibTeX @inbook{Pope2015,
title = {Why Firms Participate in the Global Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives, 2000-2012},
author = {Shawn Pope},
editor = {Alwyn Lim AND Kiyo Tsutsui},
doi = {10.1017/CBO9781316162354.008},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
pages = {251-285},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
address = {Cambridge, UK},
chapter = {8},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
|
